Morphological changes in in vitro propagated pineapple varieties (‘MD-2’ and ‘Champaka F-153’) during the growth phase under field conditions

Main Article Content

Romelio Rodríguez Sánchez
Carol C. Carvajal Ortiz
Diana Rodríguez Hernández
Exnier González Suarez
Carol C. Carvajal Ortiz
Gustavo Y. Lorente González
Lelurlys Nápoles Borrero
Oscar Concepción Laffitte

Abstract

In vitro multiplication is a feasible technique for the accelerated propagation of pineapple (Ananas comosus var. comosus), particularly when introducing new varieties at a commercial scale. This study was conducted at the “Pineapple Production” Base Business Unit, part of the Ceballos Agroindustrial Company, to compare the field performance of two micropropagated pineapple varieties, hybrid ‘MD-2’ and ‘Champaka F-153’, under the edaphoclimatic conditions of Ciego de Ávila, Cuba. Plants were established at a density of 68,000 ha⁻¹ in double rows on raised beds covered with plastic mulch. A randomized complete block design with three replications per treatment was used. Every 90 days, 20 homogeneous plants per plot were randomly selected and evaluated for: survival rate, plant fresh mass, plant length, number of roots, number of leaves, and fresh mass, length, and width of the “D” leaf. Results indicated that ‘Champaka F-153’ reached 99 % survival after 90 days, while ‘MD-2’ reached 96 %. During this period, fresh mass increased by 226 g in ‘Champaka F-153’ and 156 g in ‘MD-2’, with significant differences between varieties. However, at 270 days, no significant differences were observed in the number of leaves, the number of roots, or the fresh mass of the “D” leaf. These findings suggest initial differences in adaptation and growth that tend to level off during later vegetative stages.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rodríguez Sánchez, R., Carvajal Ortiz, C. C., Rodríguez Hernández, D., González Suarez, E., Carvajal Ortiz, C. C., Lorente González, G. Y., Nápoles Borrero, L., & Concepción Laffitte, O. (2026). Morphological changes in in vitro propagated pineapple varieties (‘MD-2’ and ‘Champaka F-153’) during the growth phase under field conditions. Cultivos Tropicales, 47(3), https://cu-id.com/2050/v47n3e02. Retrieved from https://ediciones.inca.edu.cu/index.php/ediciones/article/view/1933
Section
Original Article

References

Torres-Avila A, Aguilar-Ávila J, Santoyo-Cortés VH, Martínez-González EG, Aguilar-Gallegos N. Innovation in the pineapple value chain in Mexico: Explaining the global adoption process of the ‘MD-2’ hybrid. Agricultural Systems. 2022;198:103386. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103386

Vázquez Jiménez J, Bartholomew D, Wilkerson C, Hoogenboom G, Vargas Leitón B. Optimizing agronomic practices for pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr. ‘MD-2’ cultivar) production based on growth stages. Fruits. 2023;78(3):1-10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17660/th2023/001

Rodríguez-Alfonso D, Isidrón-Pérez M, Alfonso-González D, Grajal-Martín MJ, Hormaza-Uroz JI, Herrera-Isidrón L. Diversity of pineapple genetic resources in Cuba: threats and actions for minimizing losses. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana. 2017;40(1):93-101. Available from: https://doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2017.1.93-101

Aguilera-Arango GA, Puentes-Díaz CL, Morillo-Coronado Y. Importance of genetic resources of pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr. var. comosus) in Colombia. Agronomía Mesoamericana. 2022;33(2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v33i2.47233

Uriza-Ávila DE, Torres-Ávila A, Aguilar-Ávila J, Santoyo-Cortés VH, Zetina-Lezama R, Rebolledo-Martínez A. La piña mexicana frente al reto de la innovación. Avances y retos en la gestión de la innovación. Colección Trópico Húmedo. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (UACH); México 2018. Available from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://repositorio.chapingo.edu.mx/items/6728c88a-69a6-4835-974f-0aa3d9973566

Rebolledo-Martínez A, Peralta-Antonio N, Rebolledo-García RL, Becerril-Román AE, Rebolledo-Martínez L, Jaén-Contreras D, et al. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content in different organs of pineapple cultivars at different planting density. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 2023;26(2):081. Available from: https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.4567

Rodríguez R, Becquer R, Pino Y, López D, Rodríguez RC, Lorente González GY. Fruits production of pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.) ‘MD-2’ from vitroplants. Cultivos Tropicales. 2016;37(especial):40-8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4732.3765

Isidrón M. Caracterización del germoplasma de piña colectado en Cuba mediante prospección Nacional: Localización, diversidad genética y situación actual. Cultivos Tropicales. 2003;24(1):65-71. Available from: http://ediciones.inca.edu.cu/index.php/ediciones/article/view/603

Rodríguez-Alfonso D, Isidrón-Pérez M, Barrios O, Fundora Z, Hormaza JI, Grajal-Martín MJ. Minimal morphoagronomic descriptors for Cuban pineapple germplasm characterisation. Horticultural Science (Prague). 2020;47(1):28-35. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17221/60/2018-HORTSCI

Ávila R, Rodríguez R. Introduction and diversification of new pineapple cultivars in Ceballos Agroindustrial Enterprise, Cuba. Newsletter of the Workgroup Pineapple, International Society for Horticultural Science. 2019;(26):26-7. Available from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstreams/e1559406-7fbb-40fc-b062-4ffed123b8b7/download

Abdi G. Optimizing in vitro nutrient and ex vitro soil mediums-driven responses for multiplication, rooting, and acclimatization of pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.) cv. Smooth Cayenne. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2026;158(1):12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-026-02845-2

Saha I, Dolui D, Ghosh A, Sarkar B, De AK, Adak MK. Assessment of Irradiation Stress in Crop Plants with Modern Technical Advances. En: Sustainable Agriculture in the Era of Climate Change. Springer; 2020. p. 235-49. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86893-4

Restrepo-Díaz H, Sánchez-Reinoso AD. Ecophysiology of fruit crops: A glance at its impact on fruit crop productivity. En: Srivastava AK, Hu C, editores. Fruit Crops. Elsevier; 2020. p. 59-66. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2018-0-05145-5

Sinaga AOY, Marpaung DSS. Abiotic stress-induced gene expression in pineapple as a potential genetic marker. Advanced Agrochem. 2024;3(2):133-42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aac.2024.01.002

Fischer G, Orduz-Rodríguez JO, Amarante CVT. Sunburn disorder in tropical and subtropical fruits. A review. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas. 2022;16(3):e15703. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2022v16i3.15703

Munné-Bosch S, Vincent C. Physiological mechanisms underlying fruit sunburn. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 2019;38(2):140-57. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2019.1635919

Pérez-Bonachea L, Gómez-Kosky R, Martínez M. Caracterización en campo de plantas de piña (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.) cultivar ‘Cayena Lisa Serrana’ genéticamente modificadas en las generaciones T3 y T4. Biotecnología Vegetal. 2025;25(2):89-102. Available from: https://revista.ibp.co.cu/index.php/BV/index

Bhowmick N, Deb P, Munsi P, Ghosh SK. Morphological characterization and performance of different pineapple (Ananas comosus) varieties in northern parts of West Bengal. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2022;92(5):567-71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i5.124072

Rodríguez-Escriba RC, Rodríguez-Cartaya ID, Lorente GY, López D, Izquierdo RE, Borroto LS. Efecto del déficit hídrico sobre cambios morfo-fisiológicos y bioquímicos en plantas micropropagadas de piña MD-2 en la etapa final de aclimatización. Cultivos Tropicales. 2016;37:64-73. Available from: https://ediciones.inca.edu.cu/index.php/ediciones/index

Liang Z, Zhang H, Jin X, Zhai P, Zhao Y, Li C, et al. Effect of Different Fertilizer Models on the Growth, Development, Yield and Quality of Pineapple in Tropics. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops. 2022;43(11):2345-54. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2022.11.014

González JL. Yield and Quality of Fruits of Pineapple Cultivars Treated With CPA With Respect to Planting Date and Density. International Journal of Agronomy. 2025;2025:8891234. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2025/8891234

Bartholomew DP, Paull RE, Rohrbach KG, editores. The Pineapple: Botany, Production and Uses. CABI Publishing; 2003. ISBN: 978-0-85199-503-8. Available from: https://ediciones.inca.edu.cu/index.php/ediciones/index

Aragon C, Carvalho L, Gonzalez J, Escalona M, Amancio S. The physiology of ex vitro pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr. var. MD-2) as CAM or C3 is regulated by the environmental conditions. Plant Cell Reports. 2012;31(4):757-69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-011-1195-7

Rodríguez R, Lorente G, Rodríguez R, Pérez O, García O, Lobaina Y. Evaluation of three fertilization systems for ‘MD-2’ pineapple plants. Acta Horticulturae. 2019;1239:27-32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1239.15

Darnaudery M, Fournier P, Léchaudel M. Low-input pineapple crops with high quality fruit: promising impacts of locally integrated and organic fertilisation compared to chemical fertilisers. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 2024;1-12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185962400015X

Villalobos-Olivera A, Lorenzo-Feijoo JC, Quintana-Bernabé N, Leiva-Mora M, Bettoni JC, Martínez-Montero ME. Morpho-anatomical and physiological assessments of cryo-derived pineapple plants (Ananas comosus var. comosus) after acclimatization. Horticulturae. 2023;9(7):841. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9070841

Most read articles by the same author(s)