Efficiency of nutrient utilization by coffee plant seedlings produced in tubes
Main Article Content
Abstract
In order to evaluate application effect of doses of controlled release fertilizers on the efficiency of the use of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium by coffee seedlings variety Isla 6-14 produced in tubes, the experiment was developed in the nursery of the Institute for Agro-Forestry Research UCTB Tercer Frente, from November 2018 to May 2019. In a completely randomized design, seven doses of the controlled release fertilizer Multicote (0; 1; 2; 3; 4; 5 and 6 g tube-1) were studied. The fertilizer was applied at the time of preparing the Brown soil substrate-bovine manure in a 1:1 ratio. The absorption of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, the efficiency of use of these macronutrients and their relationship with the seedling's quality index were evaluated. The data were subjected to a simple classification analysis of variance and Duncan's test was applied at 5 % probability to compare the means. The nutrient utilization efficiency was higher for phosphorus followed by nitrogen and finally potassium, regardless of the applied fertilizer dose. When applying the dose of 2 g tube-1 of the fertilizer, the highest efficiency values were found. The seedling's quality index increased with the efficiency of nutrient utilization.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms of the License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0):
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The journal is not responsible for the opinions and concepts expressed in the works, they are the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the assistance of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request advisable or necessary modifications. They are accepted to publish original scientific papers, research results of interest that have not been published or sent to another journal for the same purpose.
The mention of trademarks of equipment, instruments or specific materials is for identification purposes, and there is no promotional commitment in relation to them, neither by the authors nor by the publisher.
References
Gutiérrez-Benítez JR, Gaskin-Espinosa B. Aplicaciones de “Fitomas e” en posturas de cafeto variedad Caturra rojo. Revista Ingeniería Agrícola. 2017;7(1):16-21.
Mario EP da CJ, Richardson SR, Israel MP, Derivaldo P da C, Josimar NB, Rita de KG da S, et al. Multivariate analysis in the evaluation of sustrate quality and containers in the production of Arabica coffee seedlings. African Journal of Agricultural Research.
;15(3):457-63.
Bachião POB, de Rezende Maciel AL, Avila RG, Campos CN. Crescimento de mudas de cafeeiro em tubes com fertilizante de liberação lenta. 2018;10(1):105-16.
Coelho VP de M, Rosa KM, Paiva PEB, Moreira ÉFA, Carvalho M. Fertigation and growth regulator on coffee seedling production in tubes. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical. 2018;48(4):350-7.
Guisolfi LP, Lo Monaco PAV, Krause MR, Meneghelli CM, Almeida KM, Meneghelli LAM, et al. Agricultural wastes as alternative substrates in the production of conilon coffee seedlings. Biosci. j. (Online). 2020;36(3):792-8.
Guelfi D. Fertilizantes nitrogenados estabilizados, de liberação lenta ou controlada. Informações Agronômicas. 2017;157(1):1-14.
Jaeggi MEP da C, Saluci JCG, Rodrigues RR, Gravina G de A, Lima WL de. Alternative substrates in different containers for production of conilon coffee seedlings. 2018;13(1):80-9.
Sánchez C, Martínez F, Morán N, Cabanas Y, Meneses I, Vicet E. Influencia de tres tipos de tubetes y diferentes momentos de fertilización en el desarrollo de posturas de café. Café Cacao. 2018;17(1):35-43.
Morán N, Martínez F, Bustamante C. Estudio de diferentes fuentes de abono orgánico y mejoradores de sustratos en el desarrollo de posturas de cafetos producidas en tubetes de 180 cm3. Café Cacao. 2020;19(1):24-32.
Bustamante-González C, Ferrás-Negrín Y, SánchezEsmoris C. Efecto de dosis de fertilizante de liberación controlada sobre el desarrollo de posturas de cafeto. Café Cacao. 2020;19(1):51-8.
Díaz W, Caro P, Bustamante C, Sánchez C, Rodríguez M, Vázquez E. Instructivo Técnico Café Arábico (Coffea arabica Lin). Instituto de Investigaciones Agro-Forestales: Ministerio de la Agricultura. Dirección de Café y Cacao del Grupo Empresarial de Agricultura de Montaña. Instituto de Investigaciones Agro-Forestales; 2013 p. 138.
Franco-Junior KS, Carvalho JS, Guimarães BC, BarbosaCKR, Brigante GP, Dias M de S, et al. Evaluation of slow release fertilizer on the initial developmentand coffee production. 2019;14(4):538-43. doi:10.25186/cs.v14i4
Martins LD, Machado LDS, Tomaz MA, Amaral J do. Thenutritional efficiency of Coffea spp. A review. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2015;14(9):728-34. doi:10.4314/ ajb.v14i9
Amaral JFT do, Martinez HEP, Laviola BG, FernandesFilho EI, Cruz CD. Eficiência de utilização de nutrientes por cultivares de cafeeiro. Ciência Rural. 2011;41(4): 621-9. doi:10.1590/S0103-84782011005000027
Amaral J, Martinez HE, Cruz CD, Mantovani E, Novais R,Souza R. Índices de eficiência nutricional em Coffea arabica L. In 2001 [cited 2022 Dec 5]. Available from: http://www.sapc.embrapa.br/arquivos/consorcio/spcb_ana is/simposio2/solos35.pdf
Siddiqi MY, Glass ADM. Utilization index: A modifiedapproach to the estimation and comparison of nutrient utilization efficiency in plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 1981;4(3):289-302. doi:10.1080/01904168109362919
Bustamante C, Ferrás Y. Efecto del FitoMas-E en laeficiencia de utilización de nutrientes por posturas de variedades de Coffea arabica L. Café Cacao. 2019;18(1):15-23.
Cisneros-Rojas CA, Sánchez-de Prager M, MenjivarFlores JC. Efecto de bacterias solubilizadoras de fosfatos sobre el desarrollo de plántulas de café. Agronomía Mesoamericana. 2017;28(1):149-58. doi:10.15517/am.v28 i1.22021
Gonçalves SM, Guimarães RJ, Carvalho JG de, Botrel ÉP.Faixas críticas de teores foliares de macronutrientes em mudas de cafeeiro (Coffea arabica L.) produzidas em tubetes. Ciência e Agrotecnologia. 2009;33(3):743-52. doi:10.1590/S1413-70542009000300012
Sousa JS, Neves JC, Martinez HE, Alvarez VH.Relationship between Coffee Leaf Analysis and Soil Chemical Analysis. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo [Internet]. 2018 [cited 05/11/2022];42. doi:10.1590/ 18069657rbcs20170109
Espindula M, Balbino TJ, Jaraceski R, Teixeira AL,Machado JR, Pasqualotto RG. Different volumes of tubes for clonal propagation of Coffea canephora from seedlings. 2018;13(1):33-40. doi:10.25186/cs.v13i1.1353
Tessier JT, Raynal DJ. Use of nitrogen to phosphorusratios in plant tissue as an indicator of nutrient limitation and nitrogen saturation. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2003;40(3):523-34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-266 4.2003.00820.x
Pedrosa AW, Martinez HEP, Cruz CD, DaMatta FM,Clemente JM, Neto AP. Characterizing zinc use efficiency in varieties of Arabica coffee. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy. 2013;35(3):343-8. doi:10.4025/actasciagron.v35i3.16322
Tomaz MA, Sakiyama NS, Martinez HEP, Cruz CD,Zambolim L, Pereira AA. Comparison of nutritional efficiency among hydroponic grafted young coffee trees for N, P, and K. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology. 2004;4(1):92-9.
C GG. Genetic basis of inorganic plant nutrition. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. 1983;453-80.
Salamanca-Jimenez A, Doane TA, Horwath WR. Coffeeresponse to nitrogen and soil water content during the early growth stage. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2017;180(5):614-23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ jpln.201600601
de Melo B, Mendes ANG, Guimaraes PTG, Dias FP.Substratos, fontes e doses de P2O5 na produção de mudas de cafeeiro (Coffea arabica L.) em tubetes. Bioscience Journal. 2006;19(2):35-44.
Oliet J, Segura ML, Dominguez FM, Blanco E, Serrada R,Arias ML, et al. Los fertilizantes de liberación controlada lenta aplicados a la producción de planta forestal de vivero. Efecto de dosis y formulaciones sobre la calidad de Pinus halepensis Mill. Forest systems.
;8(1):207-28.
Bote AD, Zana Z, Ocho FL, Vos J. Analysis of coffee(Coffea arabica L.) performance in relation to radiation level and rate of nitrogen supply II. Uptake and distribution of nitrogen, leaf photosynthesis and first bean yields. European Journal of Agronomy. 2018;92:107-14. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2017.10.006
Neto AP, Favarin JL, Hammond JP, Tezotto T, Couto HTZ.Analysis of Phosphorus Use Efficiency Traits in Coffea Genotypes Reveals Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora Have Contrasting Phosphorus Uptake and Utilization Efficiencies. Frontiers in Plant Science [Internet]. 2016 [cited 05/11/2022];7. doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00408
Jaeggi M, Rocha R, Pereira I, Cruz D, Guarnier da SilvaR, Batista J, et al. Alternative Substrate and Recipients for the Production of Arabica Coffee Seedlings. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2020;12(5):82. doi:10.5539/jas. v12n5p82