Original articlePhysiological efficiency of the bean plant before a water deficit
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research was carried out under semi-controlled conditions from November to February of the years 2016, 2017 and 2018 in the Scientific Technological Unit of Base Los Palacios, Cuba, with the aim of evaluating the effect of the water deficit on the physiological efficiency of the bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cv. "Delicia 364". 80 bean seeds were sown per 1.40 m2 pot. A Completely Randomized Experimental Design was used, with three treatments and four repetitions: two with water deficit (beginning of wilting of the leaves and when the yellowing of the apex of the leaves began) and a control with irrigation at field capacity. The water deficit was applied when the plants had between three and four true leaves. After each period of stress, the foliar water potential was determined and at the time of harvest the dry mass, the agricultural yield and its components. It was found that the water deficit imposed in the vegetative phase at different intensities caused a state of water stress in the bean plant and after recovering from it, caused increases in the aerial dry mass, number of pods and agricultural yield. The water deficit in bean plants until the beginning of the yellowing of the apex of the leaves, during the vegetative phase, increases the physiological efficiency of the plant depending on irrigation, between 16-25 %, in terms of the aerial dry mass, the number of pods per plant and the agricultural yield.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms of the License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0):
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The journal is not responsible for the opinions and concepts expressed in the works, they are the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the assistance of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request advisable or necessary modifications. They are accepted to publish original scientific papers, research results of interest that have not been published or sent to another journal for the same purpose.
The mention of trademarks of equipment, instruments or specific materials is for identification purposes, and there is no promotional commitment in relation to them, neither by the authors nor by the publisher.
References
FAO. El futuro de la alimentación y la agricultura tendencias y desafíos [Internet]. 2017. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/i6881s/i6881s.pdf. Consultado abril 2021
FAO. Versión resumida de El estado mundial de la agricultura y la alimentación. Superar los desafíos relacionados con el agua en la agricultura [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4060/cb1441es
OECD-FAO. Perspectivas agrícolas 2019-2028. Enfoque especial: América Latina. OECD Publishing, París/Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO) [Internet]. 2021 [cited 09/10/2021]. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/agriculture-and-food/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2019-2028/summary/spanish_3930e850-es?parentId=http%3A%2F%2Finstance.metastore.ingenta.com%2Fcontent%2Fpublication%2F7b2e8ba3-es
Dávila R. Frijol más resistente a la sequía. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México [Internet]. 2010 [cited 09/10/2021]. Available from: https://www.dgcs.unam.mx/boletin/bdboletin/2010_587.html
ONEI. Agricultura, ganadería, silvicultura y pesca. La Habana: Dirección de Estadísticas Agropecuarias, Oficina Nacional de Estadística e Información [Internet]. 2019; Available from: http://www.onei.gob.cu/sites/default/files/09_agricultura_ganaderia_y_pesca_2019_0.zip
Meriño-Hernandez Y, Boudet-Antomarchi A, Boicet-Fabre T, Barreiro EA, de Guevara L, Palacio AJ, et al. Rendimiento y tolerancia a la sequía de seis variedades de frijol común (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) en condiciones de campo. Centro Agrícola. 2015;42(1):69-74.
Domínguez-Suárez A, Darias-Rodríguez R, Martínez Dávalos Y, Alfonso-Negrín E. Tolerancia de variedades de frijol común (Phaseolus vulgaris) a condiciones de sequía en campo. Centro Agrícola. 2019;46(3):22-9.
Ruiz-Sanchez M, DellAmico-Rodriguez JM, Cabrera-Rodriguez JA, Munoz-Hernandez Y, M-Almeida F, Aroca R, et al. Rice plant response to suspension of the lamina of water. Part III. Cultivos Tropicales. 2020;41(2):NA-NA.
Ruiz-Sánchez M, Muños-Hernández Y, Dell’Ámico-Rodríguez JM, Cabrera-Rodríguez JA, Aroca R, Ruiz-Lozano JM. Response of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plant to suspension of the water lamina in three moments of its development. Part I. Cultivos Tropicales. 2017;38(2):61-9.
Pozo-Galves C, Cabrera-Alonso JR, Márquez-Reina E, Hernández-Hernández O, Ruiz-Sanchez M, Domínguez-Palacio D. Características y clasificación de suelos Gley Nodular Ferruginoso bajo cultivo intensivo de arroz en Los Palacios. Cultivos Tropicales. 2017;38(4):58-64.
Faure B, Benítez R, Rodríguez E, Grande O, Pérez P. Guía Técnica para la producción de frijol común y maíz. 1 ra ed. MINAG, La Habana, Cuba. 2014.
Siqueira JO, Franco AA. Biotecnologia do solo: fundamentos e perspectivas. Brasília: MEC. Brasil: ABEAS/ESAL/FAEPE; 1988 p. 179-216.
Morales-Guevara D, Dell’Amico-Rodríguez J, Jerez-Mompie E, Rodríguez-Hernández P, Álvarez-Bello I, Díaz Hernández Y, et al. A QuitoMax® effect in plants of (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under two irrigation regimes. II. Physiological variables. Cultivos Tropicales. 2017;38(4):92-101.
Barrios-Gómez EJ, López-Castañeda C, Kohashi-Shibata J. Relaciones hídricas y temperaturas altas en frijol del tipo “flor de mayo.” Agronomía Costarricense. 2011;35(1):131-45.
Sánchez-Ruiz M, Cabrera-Rodríguez A, Dell JM, Rodríguez A, Muñoz-Hernández Y, Aroca-Álvarez R, et al. Categorization of the water status of rice inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizae and with water deficit. Agronomía Mesoamericana. 2021;32(2):339-55.
Shan Z, Luo X, Wei M, Huang T, Khan A, Zhu Y. Physiological and proteomic analysis on long-term drought resistance of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):1-12. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-35711-x
Chun SC, Paramasivan M, Chandrasekaran M. Proline Accumulation Influenced by Osmotic Stress in Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiotic Plants. Frontiers in Microbiology [Internet]. 2018 [cited 09/10/2021];9. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02525
Reyes-Matamoros J, Martínez-Moreno D, Rueda-Luna R, Rodríguez-Ramírez T. Efecto del estrés hídrico en plantas de frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) en condiciones de invernadero. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencias. 2014;1(2):191-203.
Pérez-Matos A. Caracterización morfoagronómica de cinco cultivares de frijol común (phaseolus vulgaris l) en el municipio de Jobabo. Revista Caribeña de Ciencias Sociales [Internet]. 2017 [cited 09/10/2021]; Available from: https://ideas.repec.org//a/erv/rccsrc/y2017i2017-1033.html
Izquierdo-Martínez M, Santana-Baños Y, García-Cabañas A, Carrodeguas-Díaz S, Aguiar-González I, Ruiz-Sanchez M, et al. Agronomic response of five common bean cultivars in an agroecosystem of Consolación del Sur municipality. Centro Agrícola. 2018;45(3):11-6.
Maqueira-López LA, Rojan-Herrera O, Mesa S a. P, Torres-de Noval W la. Growth and yield of black bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Los Palacios town. Cultivos Tropicales. 2017;38(3):58-63.
Polón-Pérez R, Miranda-Caballero A, Ramírez-Arrebato MA, Maqueira-López LA. Efectos del estrés de agua sobre el rendimiento de granos en la fase vegetativa en el cultivo del frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias. 2014;23(4):33-6.
Nielsen DC. Black Bean Sensitivity to Water Stress at Various Growth Stages. Crop Science. 1998;38(2):422-7. doi:https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800020025x
Dominguez A, Rodríguez R, Dávalos Y, Castillo M, Sosa D. Selection of varieties of common red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), tolerant to drought in different irrigation conditions in the field. Bionatura. 2021;6(1):1473-7. doi:10.21931/RB/2021.06.01.6
Ruiz-Sánchez M, Muños Y, Ámico J, Cabrera J, Polón R, Aroca R, et al. Recovery of the rice plant to the suspension of the water lamina. Part II. 2018;39(3):75-80.
Polon-Perez R, Ruiz-Sanchez M, Miranda-Caballero A, Ramirez-Arrebato MA. Effects of Water Stress on Grain Yield in the Vegetative Phase of bean Cultivation (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias. 2017;26(1):66-70.
Garcia M, Espinosa A. Efecto de la sequía en el rendimiento del cultivo del frijol [Internet]. Monografias.com. 2012 [cited 09/10/2021]. Available from: https://www.monografias.com/trabajos94/efecto-sequia-rendimiento-del-cultivo-del-frijol/efecto-sequia-rendimiento-del-cultivo-del-frijol
Nahar K, Ullah SM, Gretzmacher R. Influence of soil moisture stress on height, dry matter and yield of seven tomato cultivars. Canadian J. Scientific Industrial Res. 2011;2(4):160-3.