Productivity of soybean cultivars in two planting seasons
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research was developed in areas of the Scientific and Technological Base Unit, Los Palacios, Pinar del Rio, belonging to the National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, with the objective of analyzing the productivity of soybean cultivars in two planting seasons. Cultivars DT-20, DVN-5, DT-26, DVN-6 of Vietnamese origin were used, which were sown on a Ferruginous Petroferric Nodular Gley Hydromorphic soil, on two different dates (January and May 2013), corresponding to the cold and spring seasons, respectively. A randomized block experimental design with four treatments (cultivars) and three replicates was used, and growth and agricultural yield variables were evaluated. The results showed variation among cultivars for the same planting date and between seasons. At sowing in May 2013, cultivars achieved a higher value of total aerial dry mass as well as agricultural yield. However, the best results in terms of harvest index were obtained in the January sowing. It should also be noted that in general for the two sowing dates, the variables most associated with agricultural yield were the number of pods and the number of grains per plant.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms of the License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0):
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The journal is not responsible for the opinions and concepts expressed in the works, they are the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the assistance of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request advisable or necessary modifications. They are accepted to publish original scientific papers, research results of interest that have not been published or sent to another journal for the same purpose.
The mention of trademarks of equipment, instruments or specific materials is for identification purposes, and there is no promotional commitment in relation to them, neither by the authors nor by the publisher.
References
Carciochi WD, Schwalbert R, Andrade FH, Corassa GM, Carter P, Gaspar AP, et al. Soybean seed yield response to plant density by yield environment in North America. Agronomy Journal [Internet]. 2019;111(4):1923-32. Available from: https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134/agronj2018.10.0635
Corassa GM, Amado TJ, Strieder ML, Schwalbert R, Pires JL, Carter PR, et al. Optimum soybean seeding rates by yield environment in Southern Brazil. Agronomy Journal [Internet]. 2018;110(6):2430-8. Available from: https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134/agronj2018.04.0239
Enrico JM, Conde MB, Martignone RA, Bodrero ML. Soja: evaluación de la estabilidad del rendimiento según fechas de siembra. Para mejorar la producción [Internet]. 2013;50:71-8. Available from: https://inta.gob.ar/sites/default/files/script-tmp-inta-soja-evaluacion-estabilidad-rendimiento-segun-fe.pdf
Junior CP, Kawakami J, Schwarz K, Umburanas RC, Del Conte MV, Müller MML. Sowing dates and soybean cultivars influence seed yield, oil and protein contents in subtropical environment. J. Agric. Sci [Internet]. 2017;9:188. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8c35/dd42c7255b14bb8e00646f23ebf84ad06e9d.pdf
Boyer CN, Stefanini M, Larson JA, Smith SA, Mengistu A, Bellaloui N. Profitability and risk analysis of soybean planting date by maturity group. Agronomy Journal [Internet]. 2015;107(6):2253-62. Available from: https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134/agronj15.0148
Andrade JF, Edreira JIR, Mourtzinis S, Conley SP, Ciampitti IA, Dunphy JE, et al. Assessing the influence of row spacing on soybean yield using experimental and producer survey data. Field Crops Research [Internet]. 2019;230:98-106. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037842901831414X
Romero A, Ruz R, González M. Evaluación de siete cultivares de soya (Glycine max) en las condiciones edafoclimáticas del municipio Majibacoa, Las Tunas. Pastos y Forrajes [Internet]. 2013;36(4):459-63. Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-03942013000400006
Díaz-Solis SH, Morejón-Rivera R, Maqueira-López LA, Echevarría-Hernández A, Cruz-Triana A, Roján-Herrera O. Selección participativa de cultivares de soya (Glycinemax, (L.)) en Los Palacios, Pinar del Río, Cuba. Cultivos Tropicales [Internet]. 2019;40(4). Available from: https://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/ctr/v40n4/1819-4087-ctr-40-04-e02.pdf
Hernández-Jiménez A, Pérez-Jiménez JM, Bosch-Infante D, Speck NC. La clasificación de suelos de Cuba: énfasis en la versión de 2015. Cultivos Tropicales [Internet]. 2019;40(1). Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S0258-59362019000100015&script=sci_arttext&tlng=pt
Esquivel MA. El cultivo y utilización de la soya en Cuba. Manual Técnico. Asociación Cubana de Producción Animal. 1997;56.
Crop SG. STATGRAPHICS® Plus [Internet]. 2000.(Profesional) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.statgraphics.com/statgraphics/statgraphics.nsf/pd/pdpricing
Iznaga AC, Romero SC, Valdés AB, Sánchez AC, Pérez RA, Valdés GR. Acumulación de materia seca, rendimiento biológico, económico e índice de cosecha de dos cultivares de soya [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] en diferentes espaciamientos entre surcos. Centro Agrícola [Internet]. 2011;38(2):5-10. Available from: http://cagricola.uclv.edu.cu/descargas/pdf/V38-Numero_2/cag022111784.pdf
Mwiinga B, Sibiya J, Kondwakwenda A, Musvosvi C, Chigeza G. Genotype x environment interaction analysis of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) grain yield across production environments in Southern Africa. Field Crops Research [Internet]. 2020;256:107922. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378429020312065
Kawasaki Y, Tanaka Y, Katsura K, Purcell LC, Shiraiwa T. Yield and dry matter productivity of Japanese and US soybean cultivars. Plant Production Science [Internet]. 2016;19(2):257-66. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1343943X.2015.1133235
Barrientos Llanos H, del Castillo Gutiérrez CR, García Cárdenas M. Análisis de crecimiento funcional, acumulación de biomasa y translocación de materia seca de ocho hortalizas cultivadas en invernadero. Revista de Investigación e Innovación Agropecuaria y de Recursos Naturales [Internet]. 2015;2(1):76-86. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?pid=S2409-16182015000100010&script=sci_arttext
Saryoko A, Fukuda Y, Lubis I, Homma K, Shiraiwa T. Physiological activity and biomass production in crop canopy under a tropical environment in soybean cultivars with temperate and tropical origins. Field Crops Research [Internet]. 2018;216:209-16. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378429017313928
Lopez-Pereira M, Connor DJ, Hall AJ. Intercepted radiation and radiation-use efficiency in sunflower crops grown at conventional and wide inter-row spacings: Measurements and modeled estimates of intercepted radiation. Field Crops Research [Internet]. 2020;246:107684. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378429019311748
Tao Z, Wang D, Yang Y, Zhao G, Chang X. Light interception and radiation use efficiency response to tridimensional uniform sowing in winter wheat. Journal of integrative agriculture [Internet]. 2018;17(3):566-78. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095311917617155
Maqueira-López LA, la-Noval WT de, Roján-Herrera O, Pérez-Mesa SA, Toledo D. Respuesta del crecimiento y rendimiento de cuatro cultivares de soya Glycine max (L.) Merril) durante la época de frío en la localidad de Los Palacios. Cultivos Tropicales [Internet]. 2016;37(4):98-104. Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0258-59362016000400009
Chaves-Barrantes NF, Gutiérrez-Soto MV. Respuestas al estrés por calor en los cultivos. I. Aspectos moleculares, bioquímicos y fisiológicos. Agronomía Mesoamericana. 2017;28(1):237- 53.
Allen Jr LH, Zhang L, Boote KJ, Hauser BA. Elevated temperature intensity, timing, and duration of exposure affect soybean internode elongation, mainstem node number, and pod number per plant. The Crop Journal [Internet]. 2018;6(2):148-61. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214514118300035
Egli DB. Crop growth rate and the establishment of sink size: a comparison of maize and soybean. Journal of Crop Improvement [Internet]. 2019;33(3):346-62. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15427528.2019.1597797
Monzon JP, La Menza NC, Cerrudo A, Canepa M, Edreira JIR, Specht J, et al. Critical period for seed number determination in soybean as determined by crop growth rate, duration, and dry matter accumulation. Field Crops Research [Internet]. 2021;261:108016. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378429020313009
Nico M, Miralles DJ, Kantolic AG. Natural post-flowering photoperiod and photoperiod sensitivity: Roles in yield-determining processes in soybean. Field Crops Research [Internet]. 2019;231:141-52. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378429018311237
Wei Y, Jin J, Jiang S, Ning S, Liu L. Quantitative response of soybean development and yield to drought stress during different growth stages in the Huaibei Plain, China. Agronomy [Internet]. 2018;8(7):97. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/8/7/97